|
Climate Dossier -
The United States
9th
December 1997
During the
Kyoto discussions the US Senate voiced its
concern over the attempts made by the
Clinton-Gore administration to reach a deal.
Despite America being accountable for 30% of world
CO2 emissions, the senate wanted a deal that
secured: "No
erosion of American sovereignty, no hidden
taxes, no loss of American jobs, no disadvantage
to American business, and no special advantages
to the Third World."
29th March
2001
President
Bush decides to walk away from the 1997 Kyoto
Protocol. White House spokesman Ari Fleischer
said: "The president has been unequivocal. He
does not support the Kyoto treaty. It is not in
the United States' economic best interest."
10th
December 2005
Kyoto
Protocol comes into effect without the United
States. America confirms that it is willing to
talk, as long as any talks are "open and
non-binding".
1st
February 2006
In his State
of the Union speech the President said
that the US wanted to replace 75% of oil imports
by 2025. Oil being replaced with Ethanol and
other 'green' fuels, which were likely to
further increase deforestation and CO2
emissions. America's dependency on oil rather
than global warming, which was not referenced in
the speech, was unfortunately driving the
Presidents thinking.
14th
February 2006
Jim Hansen,
the director of the Nasa Goddard Institute for
Space Studies and climate research, has
confirmed that the US government has tried to
stop him from speaking openly about some of the
Institute's latest findings.
18th May
2006
During the
UN's Climate talks, the U.S. climate negotiator
Harlan Watson reconfirmed that the USA has no
plans to rejoin Kyoto. Mr. Watson said that it
would "cost US jobs and wrongly excluded
developing nations from a first round."
16th
November 2006
Three
democratic chairs for the Senate have written to
President Bush to ask for a total reversal of US
policy on global warming. Within days the
President said that there would be "no policy
change."
10th June
2007
At the G8
summit, President Bush insisted on a final
global warming text, which did not refer to
binding targets but merely stated that "the
G8 will look to achieve 50% emission cuts by the
year 2050."
27th
September 2007
The US stages
a conference on global warming, which leads to
no further agreement. Environment campaigners
criticise the US for undermining the UN's
efforts and called the conference a "distraction
and a sideshow." and an attempt to cloud the
political process ahead of the UN Bali summit in
December.
16th
December 2007
The final
text to come out of the UN's Bali conference did
not make any reference to legally binding
targets. Neither a CO2 reduction target for 2020
of 25-40% nor a goal for 2050 of a 50% reduction
were included. Blocked by the USA negotiators
throughout the entire week, we were left with
nothing but: "Recognizing that deep cuts in
global emissions will be required".
18th
December 2007
Immediately after the Bali
conference, the US administration has said that
it had "serious concerns" about the agreement
reached, which undermined the effort of the UN,
as well as signalling that a replacement for
Kyoto may have to be sought without the US.
20th December 2007
The Bush
administration obstructed California's bid
to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from
automobiles, dealing a blow to the state's
attempts to combat global warming. |